umtalelab.com
NAVIGATION
  • Writing
  • LabWIP
  • Archive
TOPICS
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Tests
CONTACT
  • [email protected]
  • Telegram
  • YouTube
  • Patreon
© 2019–2026 UMTALE LABGLORY TO UKRAINEPrivacy Policy
Writing ▾
LabWIP
About
Contact
// UMTALE.LAB/MENUESC — close · ↵ — go
// UMTALE.LABMENU
MAIN// MENU
LabWIP→
UMTALE LAB · BENCH ONLINE
UMTALE.LAB/WRITING/HARDWARE/// AMD-RYZEN-5-3600XT-OFFERS-GAMING-PERFORMANCE-ON-PAR-WITH-THE-CHEAPER-INTEL-CORE-I5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT offers gaming performance on par with the cheaper Intel Core i5-10400
NEWS · HARDWARE
06/30/2020
PUBLISHEDJune 30, 2020
READING2 min

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT offers gaming performance on par with the cheaper Intel Core i5-10400

Benchmarks reveal that the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT delivers similar gaming performance to the more affordable Intel Core i5-10400. However, AMD's AM4 platform remains the better value for PC builds right now.

UmTale
RYZEN 5 3600XT·CORE I5-10400·RYZEN 5 3600X
READ ↓
РЕАКЦІЇ

Just a few hours ago, Teclab published gaming benchmarks for two CPUs: the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT and Intel Core i5-10400. This gave us our first look at the performance of AMD's new six-core Matisse Refresh chip.

First, it's worth noting that the Ryzen 5 3600XT is a 95-watt chip, while the Core i5-10400 is officially rated at 65 watts. Unofficially, however, we know the Core i5-10400's power consumption can reach up to 90 watts.

⤢ ВІДКРИТИ

Let's look at the performance comparison between the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT and Intel Core i5-10400:

Game

Intel Core i5-10400 (Average FPS)

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (Average FPS)

World War Z (1080p Vulkan)

162 FPS

160 FPS

CS:GO (1080p)

349.56 FPS

351.49 FPS

Shadow of The Tomb Raider (1080p DX12)

116 FPS

115 FPS

Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint (1080p Vulkan)

129 FPS

126 FPS

Metro Exodus (1080p DX12)

74.34 FPS

73.29 FPS

Rainbow Six Siege (1080p)

307 FPS

303 FPS

Assassin's Creed Odyssey (1080p)

78 FPS

81 FPS

Borderlands 3 (1080p DX12)

82.46 FPS

79.64 FPS

The results from our colleagues appear quite disappointing for the Ryzen 5 3600XT. Consider this: it's priced at $249, while the competing Core i5-10400, which performs similarly, costs only around $190. Even the recently discounted Ryzen 5 3600X, now $200, isn't the best value. But, as odd as it may sound, AMD doesn't necessarily need to cut prices on its six-core models in the near future. A cheaper CPU needs to be paired with an affordable motherboard, and that's where Intel currently runs into issues.

Compatible LGA 1200 motherboards are currently expensive, making a system built on that platform significantly pricier.

Ultimately, while the Intel Core i5-10400 CPU itself offers better value, investing in the AMD AM4 platform makes more sense right now.

Obviously, the situation will improve in the coming months as more affordable LGA 1200 motherboards become available. But for now, it is what it is.

TAGSRyzen 5 3600XTCore i5-10400Ryzen 5 3600X
← PREVIOUSSplave updates his records for the AMD Radeon HD 5870 graphics cardNEXT →Crash Bandicoot 4 won't have microtransactions
CONTINUE READING

Related articles

Intel Arc A380's latest BIOS update boosts GPU clock by 7.5%
NEWS · HARDWARE

Intel Arc A380's latest BIOS update boosts GPU clock by 7.5%

1 min08/21/2023
AMD Inception patch could slash performance by up to 50%
NEWS · HARDWARE

AMD Inception patch could slash performance by up to 50%

2 min08/17/2023
Rumor: Radeon RX 8000 lineup to skip a high-end graphics card
NEWS · HARDWARE

Rumor: Radeon RX 8000 lineup to skip a high-end graphics card

2 min08/06/2023